From Charles Duhigg and Keith Bradsher in the New York Times:
When Barack Obama joined Silicon Valley’s top luminaries for dinner in California last February, each guest was asked to come with a question for the president.
But as Steven P. Jobs of Apple spoke, President Obama interrupted with an inquiry of his own: what would it take to make iPhones in the United States?
…
Why can’t that work come home? Mr. Obama asked.
Mr. Jobs’s reply was unambiguous. “Those jobs aren’t coming back,” he said, according to another dinner guest.
The president’s question touched upon a central conviction at Apple. It isn’t just that workers are cheaper abroad. Rather, Apple’s executives believe the vast scale of overseas factories as well as the flexibility, diligence and industrial skills of foreign workers have so outpaced their American counterparts that “Made in the U.S.A.” is no longer a viable option for most Apple products.
Apple’s manufacturing decisions exemplify the altered circumstances of high-technology commodity production in the contemporary world. The article describes the situation, but not the solution for regions and nations wishing to insure stable and remunerative work for their people. Note especially the conditions of daily life for product assembly workers sketched out in the article. The industrial revolution appears to be repeating itself yet again with similarities of both triumph and tragedy.
![[rss]](http://ontheorganization.com/wp-content/themes/k2_1.0.3/images/feed.png)





The first issue of Volume 11 of 


